Which was the most suscessful rachel movie ?

l am a good girl . god must reward me really really soon!

Moneywise? In her pocket?

In her pocket, I'd say Josie and the Pussy Cats, I understand she got something like $1,000,000 US for that. Of course, I might have imagined reading that, don't take it as gospel.

Film-earnings wise, I'd guess either JatPC of SAT. Not sure which though.

Her best film talent-wise, I dunno, I think shes done well in everything I've seen.

---winz---
Carpe Jugulum
'Go for the throat.'

"She's All That" got about 63 $million. And "Josie and the Pussycats" got about 14 $million. SAT's the most suscessful Rachael movie in US boxoffice.

<jAkE/>

I read somewhere that "She's all That" sparked the Teen movie business. After SAT, teen movies became even more popular or something... Can anybody confirm this? I don't think I remember seein any teenage movies before the year 1999.. maybe I'm wrong..

Ur eyez have got me hooked,
With that one damn fine look,
Ur da one Rachael Leigh Cook!
Tryst+RLC

well, it was one of the first in the recent revival of teen movies, along with can't hardly wait and empire records.

however, it didn't really start the teen movie trend. look at the john hughes movies in the 80s and all those copycats (pretty in pink, breakfast club, fast times at ridgemont high, sixteen candles, ferris bueller's day off, etc.).

and before that there were all those movies in the 60s about beach parties and dancing the twist and all that. most of them plotless, featuring whatever singer was hip at the time, like Ricky Nelson or Frankie Avalon or something.

And of course, let's not forget a Hard Day's Night or Help!

Having said all that, I think She's All That is probably one of the best of the recent revival of teen movies.

Hmm, I'm guessing TR the accountant will have some more definite numbers for us.



-Sean J

She's thrown all caution to the wind
Hoping to catch it in her sails
When her ship comes in

LOL! I'm not Rachael's accountant.

-TR

Actually I'm Rachael's accountant. Want more definite numbers? Here they are.
"She's All That" got 63,366,996 $.
"Josie and the Pussycats" got 14,271,015 $.

<jAkE/>

Woow 63million dollars
Compaired to movies like "star wars" and "spiderman" is 63 still a big figure ?

l am a good girl . god must reward me really really soon!

Shes all that had the most!

Btw. Thats my favorite movie with her!
She looks very cute in there! REALLY CUTE!!

LiVe YoUr oWn CaUsE YoU DiE YoUR oWn
--------------------------------------

That is not big, sam. BTW the movie was really good.

<jAkE/>

wot kind of figures do really successful films bring in, like forest gump and films that win loadsa grammies and stuff

a part of me gets sick, a part of me gets sore.

Can't really follow you there, Such the fool, Can you please refraise/remotivate/something similar, your last post My english isn't that perfect, so: "What do you mean with your post? " I would appreciate it if you would enlighten me with some more info!
Thanks Bericht!

Indeed

So I think lord of the rings (only the two towers)
got 333.623.857 US-Dollars in the US and 872.500.000 US-Dollars in total!
That's a bit more than 63.000.000, but i think 63 is not bad to start with. I mean, i hope there will be more and much more successful movies with RLC!

63 million dosen't seem like too much when compared to the grosses of Lord of the Rings, Star Wars,etc. Remember, though, that those movies cost 63 million - 100 million dollars just to be made! I don't know how much SAT cost, but even if it cost 10 million to be made, 53 million dollars is a great profit for a "'B'-grade" teen movie. I could be wrong, but I think that the "John Hughes Era" was thought to be over when SAT came out so it is amazing, and shows the talent of Rachael, that SAT made as much as it did, when it did.

Flavor of the month wannabe.

Remember that everything needs to be considered in ratios when looking at these things. Lord of the Rings cost $94 million to make and grossed $334 million in the U.S. for a return of $3.56 for every dollar spent.

SAT cost $10 million to make and grossed $63 million for $6.30 for every dollar spent.

However, when you look at all the other endorsements, worldwide gross, etc, I'm sure The Two Towers would end alot higher than $6.30.

It's alot more complicated than that to run the actual numbers, but that's a simple version.

(Note: This post, along with most posts written by this screename, is intended as sarcasm. If you begin to take things I say seriously, please seek medication.)

kool thanks

a part of me gets sick, a part of me gets sore.

=D

w00t thx

LiVe YoUr oWn CaUsE YoU DiE YoUR oWn
--------------------------------------

Mozart
Lord of the rings made 872 million

l am a good girl . god must reward me really really soon!

What is the most sucessful movie ever made ?
And how much did the movie earn ?

l am a good girl . god must reward me really really soon!